NEWS REPORT:

"Quantum information teleported from light to matter (Thursday, October 5, 2006. 1:51 pm (Reuters). Old News! To learn how the atom transmits and sends information, see "Secrets of the Atom" (1999), page 126 and Chap.XI.

 

 

The above graphs represent points along the dynamic electromagnetic waves surrounding the hydrogen atom. The differences between the two curves represent a fundamental enigma.

The galaxies, stars and planets are all made of matter. But w hat is "matter"? What, exactly, is an atom? Why are objects attracted to one another by the force of gravity and what is gravity? Is the atom a mechanical device with sharp edges, such as is suggested by the theories of Quantum Mechanics? Or is it a dynamic electric, magnetic or electromagnetic field that extends out into space indefinitely? Is it a self-regulating servomechanism,? Can it receive and transmit information? Is all matter mechanical? To find the answers, please explore this web site, especially the controversy page

What is a "quantum"? What is the mechanism that produces the force of gravity? Is it possible to exceed the "speed of light"? What is field theory, and what is the definition of a field? What is a wave? What is "transverse mass"? Do you believe that Quantum Mechanics can answer these questions? Thee are answered in Dr. Vlasak's books (see Chemical Heritage Magazine review: for a review of "Planck's Columbia Lectures"). There are actually two quantum theories: Planck's quantum theory and Quantum Mechanics. These two theories are radically different. Planck's origninal theory was based on the idea that atoms assume stable states, and the difference in the energy between states is constant, where the quantum change in energy is hf. Planck's theory was based on an electromagnetic model of the atom, whereas Quantum Theory is a patchwork of sub-theories, all of which do not have to conform entirely with one another. For instance, the electron can be a particle or a wave, assuming dual relationships. Planck, on the other hand, showed that his model agrees with the various laws of physics and chemistry in every way. Planck's model has not changed for 100 years, while the models of Quantum Mechanics have changed considerably over the past few decades. The Unified Field Theory that is described here is based on the electromagnetic model of the atom, representing the atom as an electronic circuit and an electromagnetic transmitter and receiver of energy.

The Einstein/Minkowski relationship was based on the four-dimensional time/space equation in which time and space are allowed to vary orthogonally. According to Dr. Vlasak, this concept is not well understood, and it is not necessary to have such a complex and confusing picture of the universe. His analyses show that it is the field of the atom that varies in this manner, and he proves that the time/space variation of the atom's field correlates with Maxwell's equations. Therefore, time and space are constant throughout the universe! See Q&A4.

It is often helpful to have questions which are answered in order to aid in understanding a theory. Readers can find some interesting things and are can submit questions. See Q&A.

What can we depend upon in today's understanding of the physics of the real world? A manipulation of " Planck's natural units" provides some fundamental insights.

At least 80% of the mass/energy of the universe is made of hydrogen. Neils Bohr developed the model of the "Bohr Atom", but the Bohr model does not conform to reality. The new model described here, however, does conform to the known measurements of atoms. For a brief description of the approach that was used, including classical analysis, see Planck's probability method for stable states and Einstein's comment "God does not play dice"

Some physicists believe that the methods of quantum mechanics can provide all of the answers to the unsolved mysteries of science. However, this has not yet happened. Einstein wanted to establish a unified field theory, uniting the concepts of "matter" and "field", but was unsuccessful. Quantum mechanics does not provide this unification and actually defeats it because of all of the assumptions and disjointed theories. Dr. Vlasak believes that the proper approach is to begin with the concept of the electromagnetic field and define mass and objects as dynamic field wave configurations. Discover more about this QM controversy.

Dr. Vlasak: "The material in my books is all based on measurements made by other scientists, which has been thoroughly verified and accepted by the scientific community and my own extensive laboratory and field measurements throughout the years". He has a more detailed commentary that give some basic clues as to how these discoveries were made.

He has some opinions and comments about contemporary physics that may raise some eyebrows.

 

The new and revolutionary and theories on this site will have a significant effect the science community once they are accepted. They are all based on real world measurements. No new and unproved"particles". None of the restrictions of Quantum Mechanics, but with extensive verifiable physical evidence to challenge existing theory. Learn about the secret of gravity on these pages. You may want to start with an overview of this site.

A new Unified Field Theory includes a model of the hydrogen atom, from which Einstein's energy equation was derived in two short pages! A number of other interesting links are found on this page.

Learn about logarithms and how to solve for a logarithm or decibel without a calculator using only one 3-digit number! See graphs that illustrate the method, which promote a better understanding.

A thought-provoking scientific problem for skeptics or the curious. Don't miss the penny puzzle for a huge surprise. Learn why and how electromagnetic waves must bend with motion. These linsights lend firther support to a gravitational model that was first published 10 years ago and has been since refined.

The two graphs shown below illustrate that Einstein's speed of light theory /has a previously undiscovered flaw.

 

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle Versus "Characterization"

The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle asserts that the position of fast moving particles cannot be measured accurately. According to quantum mechanics, the more precisely the determination of the position of a particle, the less precisely its momentum is, or vice versa. As a result, the quantum mechanics model of the hydrogen atom offers only an approximation of the position of the electron. Is this principle always valid, or is the Heinsinberg Principle flawed?