Some physicists have claimed that Dr. Vlasak's electrical circuit model
does not conform to either the original quantum theory of Max Planck
or that of quantum mechanics (Neils Bohr has sometimes been given credit
for quantum theory, although his contributions came some 15 years after
those of Professor Planck). Dr. Vlasak however, provides supporting evidence
to counter these claims. In a detailed study of Planck's writings he found
a pleasant surprise: Planck had also used the electronic oscillator as his
radiation model for the atom. In fact, he generally referred to atoms as
"oscillators". Both the Planck model and Dr. Vlasak's
model are compatible with each other and the methods of modern electronic
analysis. But Dr. Vlasak took it one step further and applied Heaviside/Cauchy
calculus in the analysis and was able to derive and plot a picture of
the time function of an energy state! The results were presented
in the tenth chapter of his fourth book: Planck's
Columbia Lectures, which was published in 2005. Planck's original
recorded and translated presentation at Columbia University is also included
in this book. Some physicists are also unaware that mass has transverse
properties, and that transverse mass is quite different from the
commonly assumed longitudinal mass. Planck analyzed these properties
in detail, and Dr. Vlasak was able to apply modern analysis to derive a
time picture of a quantum change in energy. He plans to reveal even
more important information regarding the dynamics of mass in the near future.
Vlasak's brief comments regarding his efforts: "The material
in my books is all based on measurements made by other scientists,
which has been thoroughly verified and accepted by the scientific community
and my own extensive laboratory and field measurements. These models and
scientific methods include Planck's Radiation Equation, electronic
theory, the antenna electromagnetic wave equations, Coulomb's
Law, Maxwell's equations, Ampere's Law, Lenz's Law,
the Lorentz Force, the Bohr Atom, Parseval's formula, the
Rydberg series of spectral lines and Einstein's equations.
In order to find the truth, all possibilities must be considered
and theory must conform to all measurements (as Planck had emphasized).
This statement also applies to some of the methods of quantum mechanics,
wherein the methodology is limited to a narrow range of possibilities. The
manipulations and analysis of the Schrodinger equation, for instance,
require certain limiting assumptions and may therefore be
key to my analysis is the derivation of the exact position of the electron
in the hydrogen atom, whereas in quantum mechanics it is defined only as
being located somewhere on a spherical surface having a probable radius
(religiously believed by many physicists). How is it possible to accomplish
this task? Through the process of "characterization", of
which most electrical engineers are quite familiar. Some analyses are commonly
based on the solutions to second order differential equations, but
this method is subject to the high sensitivity of coefficients,
resulting in questionable accuracy and potential subsequent misinterpretation
(Hilbert and Courant).
problem occurs with the accepted method of separation of variables
for solving the 3-dimensional equation of quantum mechanics (4-dimensional
for space and time, sometimes called the "space-time continuum"),
which is based on an important assumption that limits the conditions
for the variables. The Minkowski interpretation of the 4-diminesional
equation of the Lorentz/Einstein equation is that it is "linear".
The radiation equations, however, show that it is located in the exponent
of a vector equation. The radiation wave bends and contracts with space
and time, which does not lead to the conclusion that time
and space vary! Other new interpretive results are seen from this analysis,
including the proposition that there is a term missing in some of Maxwell's
equations that is necessary to account for the transverse properties
of radiation. The Fitzgerald/Lorentz Contraction and
Einstein's relativity equations also appear to have missing terms
or incorrect coefficients that can account for the transverse properties."
is the basic problem with Quantum Mechanics? It is a quasi-mechanical theory.
Electromagnetic fields are, as Planck put it, "perfectly elastic media".
Electric charges, electrons and protons, do not have an exact radius, as
is seen by Coulomb's equation. Therefore "the system of Hamilton's
equations of motion does not possess the general importance attributed to
it in classical dynamics". He showed this to be the case using the
example of Rayleigh's law of radiation, which is based on the equipartition
of energy, but which does not hold for all wavelengths and temperatures
(kT falloff at short wavelengths). There are various values quoted in the
references for the size of the electron and proton and other "particles"
(which are not really particles at all). These particles cannot be measured
directly, and their sizes are determined as based on various relationships,
such as Einstein's mass-energy equation, Bohr's atom model, radiation, and
the Coulomb equation. Electrons and protons are defined by their static
and dynamic electromagnetic fields, and neither has well-defined "edges".
Therefore, the physics of the future will most likely be based on electromagnetic
fields, rather than any mechanical theory.